Free CIMA CIMAPRA19-P03-1-ENG Exam Questions

Question 1

GHY is a listed company. Tom isGHY'sCEO and Peter isitsnon-executive Chair of the Board. Tom and Peterbothhave substantial relevant business and industrial experience andboth are believed to have considerable integrity. Tom and Peter quickly developed a good working relationship after Peter's appointment. They have become close friends.
Tom briefs Peter on every aspect of the business. Tom and Peter jointlyagreethe agenda foreveryboard meetingandboth agree on the manner in which matterswill be presented to theboard.
Taking account of the principles of goodcorporategovernance, which of the following statements is correct?

A : is entirely appropriate that Tom and Peter have this kind of relationship and both are acting in the best interests of the company

B : n-contentious board meetings show how well Tom and Peter are running the company and shows that the management is cohesive.

C : relationship between Peter and Tom may have a detrimental effect on company decision making as the Boardis not always being informed about matters in an unbiased manner.

D : nce the non-executive chair clearly has a significant role within this company there is little danger that any individual will become excessively dominant.

Answer: C

Question 2

Which TWO of the following scenarios should be considered in strategic scenario planning by a publishing company that specialises in academic textbooks?

A : ere could be a change in the technology used by consumers, such as smaller mobile phones with smaller screens

B : dget changes could have an impact on the funding available to college and university libraries

C : terms offered by media companies for film rights for books could change

D : The quality of output from printing presses might improve

E : vironmental concerns could lead to a decrease in the availability of trees to make paper

Answer: B,C

Question 3

An electricity company owns and operates a nuclear power station located ten miles from a large city. A recent and very extensive engineering examination of the power station concludes with the estimate that the probability of a major nuclear disaster within the next 20 years is 0.2%.
Which of the following best explains the relevance of quantifying the risk in that way?

A : ere is no acceptable level of risk for a major nuclear accident and so the probability has little information value in itself.

B : probability is so low as to be ignored.

C : directors will be able to argue that they were not negligent in the event of a major disaster within the 20 year period.

D : The calculation of a precise probability demonstrates that the engineers who conducted the inspection are experts in their field.

Answer: A

Question 4

C is a large international supermarket chain. It has many thousands of suppliers and many thousands of potential suppliers competing for shelf space m its supermarkets.
Which of the following provisions would be appropriate for C to include m its ethical code in relation to its suppliers?
Select ALL that apply

A : hall insist on an exclusivity agreement with each supplier so that identical products are not available from other outlets

B : hall endeavour to adhere to the terms of its contracts with its suppliers at all times

C : hall continuously remind suppliers that it always has several alternative suppliers to choose from.

D : hall not use its buying power unscrupulously.

E : hall keep confidential all information received from suppliers and potential suppliers

F : hall endeavour to take as high a percentage of each supplier's output as possible

Answer: A,B,D

Question 5

You are theManagementAccountant for a company which supplies baked food to a string of retail outlets; biscuits, cakes, savoury snacks etc.
You discover that a trainee employee, who is responsible for cleaning out the delivery vans has been taking damaged goods and packets which have reached their sales expiry date and has been selling them to friends. These products would otherwise have been discarded as waste.
The trainee in question is the nephew of one of the senior managers.
What is the correct course of action?

A : ve a quiet word with the trainee and ask him to stop.

B : ve a quiet word with the senior manager, the trainee's relative and askthem to deal with it.

C : cument the facts and escalate to the trainee's manager.

D : nothing, the product was designated as waste anyway.

Answer: C